![]() I’ll show you how to master a range of genres and take you through all the steps needed to make your masters sound like professional records. Would it be better to master the project in Logic or Waveburner And would you have any tips on the proper way to master a project like this Thank you for your help. This fly-on-the-wall course shows you exactly how to make masters that sound great. If you’re still struggling, check out my Master Your Mixes course right here. The tricky part is to make your ragtag collection of demos sound like a record. Go back and forth between all the songs until they sound like a record.īecause it’s easy to make one song sound good. Looking at the frequency response in your meters might sound like cheating, but it is a good way to see if one song is lacking in a certain area.Īnd finally, like I said, compare. Use metering tools to gauge the loudness and frequency response of each song. You may prefer how a DAW works for those purposes, but that doesnt mean the DAW itself is better suited. I heavily disagree (except with surround, but OP didnt mention that). Back and Forth ComparisonsĪfter that, it’s all about going back and forth between songs to make sure they blend well with each other. There are DAWs that are much better suited for mixing and mastering, especially when you start dealing with multi channel or spatial audio. I use Waveburner for mastering and it’s easy to raise or lower the gain of each song so that they all flow together nicely.Īs for frequency and dynamic range goes, I use multiband compression with very similar settings across the board and I always use a reference track to gauge how my masters sound compared to a commercial track. You can’t have one louder than the other and they need to sound similar both in dynamic range and frequency response.Ī great way to start is to make sure each song is at the same volume. You need to make every song sound like they belong together. Mastering is like making a ragtag band of teenagers play as a team We’ve talked about this before, and you should be familiar with the steps needed to get a good sounding master.īut when you throw a few more songs into the mix it becomes trickier.īecause the goal is to make this collection of songs sound like an album. Sorry for so many questions but this is my first 'gig' in this area and with 12,000 CDs to be pressed off these masters I'd hate to screw up.You see, making one song sound good isn’t that difficult. I'll be burning using a Plextor burner onto Audio Master grade CDs and neither of those are budget priced items and I believe that will have more bearing on the outcome than using CDA or Nero. ![]() From my understanding of the process it matters naught but I'd like to be 100% certain. I've seen a few people suggest using Nero, my only concern is I'm going to seem a bit 'low rent' using Nero instead of CDA. Is there any possible way that using Nero versus CDA will have any effect on the final quality? Professional Sound Use Studio One Native Effects and third-party plug-ins or external hardware processors to create a professional sound. Clients usual mastering house uses Waveburner Pro by the way. Only Studio One Professional links Songs with mastering Projects, so you can update mixes as needed without losing fades, Clip Gain edits, or any other mastering work. Now as I understand it going from 16/44.1 to cda is simply a data encoding process, no resampling is involved. Problem is I think the client may want me to include CD text which rules out CDA. So far so good, well apart from a few late nights, now I was planning on using CDA to burn the CDs. I've split the programs into tracks and done some very basic Eq to cut down the noise (much of the material came off cassette) and converted to 16 bit 44.1KHz using Vegas (some of it was already in that format, some at 16/48KHz).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |